Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Angling Fish - by James Rickard

Fish finders for the shore angler

May 4th 2008 00:55
No matter what kind of bait you use, you can't catch fish if they're not there. How do you know if fish are around? You can always go with tried and true methods and fish weed beds and structure but, what if you don't have the time to make what may be futile attempts and you need to know NOW?

It makes no difference if you're fishing from the shore or a boat, a fish finder is just the thing to eliminate non-productive areas.

Once the domain of boaters, there are fish finders on the market for bank stompers as well as boat owners.

Fish finders are basically similar to the sonar you see in submarine movies without the "pings." None the less, a pulse is sent through the water by a sending device called a transducer, the signal hits and object, and is reflected back to a viewing screen. The image and colors you see will depend on the equipment you have.





You may have seen the commercial for the Bionic Fish Finder. I often say, "You get what you pay for." In this case you'd be ahead to save the Bionic Fish Finder's cost and get some lures or a new reel.

To make a long story short, this thing just doesn't work! You get too many false readings and the transducer is weighted haphazardly and often sits askew in the water.

I really dislike the way the Bionic Fish Finder is marketed for "...dock fishing, shoreline fishing, ice fishing, off your fishing boat, off your canoe, off your kayak, from your float tube." Assuming the Bionic Fish Finder did work, if you didn't have some sort of water craft or ice fished, you'd be out of luck unless you fished from a dock because the cable between the transducer and main unit is not long enough for most shore fishing.



RF15
The Smartcast RF15
RF35
The Smartcast RF35
A couple of offerings from Humminbird are better but still "iffy." The Smartcast RF15 and RF35 both feature radio frequency transmission which means you don't have a cable between the transducer and receiver. You can get 75 feet (about 23m.) from the sending unit but, if you're fishing from a pier or other structure, you have to take that distance into consideration so it's not just 75 feet straight out.

The RF35 is unique in that it uses a watch like monitor to relay readings. For the money, around $150 for the RF15 and $90 for the RF35, screen resolution isn't bad. Although these finders have different sensitivity level settings, I don't recommend maxing them out because you don't want a "blip" every time a branch drifts by!

The RF35's watch monitor is a neat feature. I must admit though, I've never been excited about the receiver's size. The watch size screen is a little small to look at and although you can use it in a watch mode, I think it's too bulky to wear very much. A third model, the RF25 is very similar and attaches to your rod.

If I had to choose one of these, I think I'd give a nod to the RF35. From what I've seen, heard, and read, it seems they are just a little more reliable than the RF15.

If you decide to get either of these, I implore you to shop around because I've see the RF15 as cheap as $120 and the RF35 at $78 although something around $90 is the norm.


Norcross Hawkeye fish finder
The Norcross Hawkeye Fish Finder
Knowing all of this, I wish I had bought a Norcross Hawkeye FF3355P before the Smartcast. Again, shop around because I've seen these for around $50 and as high as $90.

Some people may be put off by the fact that the transducer is tethered to the display unit but you have 37 feet of cable and that's well over 11 meters.

Another thing the Hawkeye has going for it is the fact that, with fresh batteries, it will work down to 0 degrees or a chilly MINUS 17 Celsius. Although I don't ice fish, that would be important to some people and it's a feature not offered by the Smartcast.

Bottom line----none of these are as good as a fish finder mounted on a boat. However, if you fish from a dock, the shore, or something like a canoe, one of these fish finders is indispensable.



Until next time--watch yourself and watch your line!

*images from Amazon.com.





61
Vote


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   

   


Comments
2 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by tlcorbin

May 4th 2008 02:45
You really need to come to Alaska and see the salmon run, you won't a fish finder, trust me James.

Raven

Comment by James Rickard

May 4th 2008 04:09
That sounds pretty good. I didn't think of it when I was writing the post but using a fish finder takes away one excuse you can have for not catching anything!

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
8 Posts
22 Posts
25 Posts
427 Posts dating from May 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

James Rickard's Blogs

0 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
0 Post(s)
Moderated by James Rickard
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]